FORENSIC EDUCATION ON 3-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL ODONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS: CHALLENGES IN CROSS FORENSIC SCIENCE DISCIPLINARY TEACHING & LEARNING

Authors

  • Utsav Parekh Assistant professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All india institute of medical science, Rajkot, Gujarat. Author
  • Abraham Johnson Assistant Professor, School of Medico-Legal Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Gujarat, India. Author
  • Jyotirmoy Roy Post-graduate Resident, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, West Bengal, India. Author
  • Sanjay Gupta Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Author

Keywords:

Forensic Odontology, Digital Education, 3D Scanning, 3D Printing, Challenges

Abstract

Forensic odontology is a specialized subject which is a perfect amalgamation of forensic sciences and dental sciences. The subject employs various traditional and advanced digital methods for education and analysis purposes. Advent of 3-Dimentional (3D) scanning and printing technologies have majorly influenced forensic odontology community. The technology allows replications of evidence matters in both the virtual and physical realm. It allows experimentation with the replica models for development of new analytical protocols. The ever increasing popularity of digital education is also playing a major role in the development of this highly specific doctrine of science. The digital education techniques allows wide spread collaboration for common cause of teaching and development of the subject. It allows sharing of study material and 3D model of evidential material to train students. Although digital techniques have major contributions in the development of forensic odontology, the limitations must also be understood. The major drawback is poor acceptability of the replica models as evidence for the investigation purpose. The technology itself is very technique sensitive and requires expensive initial investment. The digital education system lacks the academic integrity of the student which is generally observed in traditional classroom setup. This article aims to explain the major advantages and dis advantages of the digital education and technology which has been incorporated into forensic odontology having a huge impact on the judiciary system. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shamim T. Forensic odontology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jan 1;20(1):1-2.

Luntz LL. History of forensic dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America. 1977 Jan;21(1):7.

Cameron JM, Sims BG. Forensic dentistry. Churchill Livingstone; 1974.

Berketa JW, James H, Lake AW. Forensic odontology involvement in disaster victim identification. Forensic science, medicine, and

pathology. 2012 Jun 1;8(2):148-56.

Whittaker DK, MacDonald DG. A colour atlas of forensic dentistry. Wolfe Medical Publications; 1989.

Keiser Nielsen S. Forensic odontology. Int Dent J 1968;18:668 83.

Ramakrishnan K, Sharma S, Sreeja C, Pratima DB, Aesha I, Vijayabanu B. Sex determination in forensic odontology: A review. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S398.

Avon SL. Forensic odontology: the roles and responsibilities of the dentist. Journal-Canadian Dental Association. 2004 Jul;70(7):453-8.

Matsuda S, Yoshida H, Ebata K, Shimada I, Yoshimura H. Forensic odontology with digital technologies: A systematic review. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2020 Jul 1:102004.

Johnson A, Pandey A. Three-dimensional scanning-A futuristic technology in forensic anthropology. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2019;41(2):128-31.

Wright FD, Golden GS. The use of full spectrum digital photography for evidence collection and preservation in cases involving forensic odontology. Forensic science international. 2010 Sep 10;201(1-3):59-67.

Acharya AB. Forensic dental age estimation by measuring root dentin translucency area using a new digital technique. Journal of forensic sciences. 2014 May;59(3):763-8.

Wright FD, Golden GS. The use of full spectrum digital photography for evidence collection and preservation in cases involving forensic odontology. Forensic science international. 2010 Sep 10;201(1-3):59-67.

Roy J, Rohith MM, Nilendu D, Johnson A. Qualitative assessment of the dental groove pattern and its uniqueness for forensic identification. Journal of forensic dental sciences. 2019 Jan;11(1):42.

Javaid M, Haleem A, Kumar L. Current status and applications of 3D scanning in dentistry. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2019 Jun 1;7(2):228- 33.

Boehler W, Marbs A. 3D scanning instruments. Proceedings of the CIPA WG. 2002 Sep 1;6(9).

Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Boehm J. Close-range photogrammetry and 3D imaging. Walter de Gruyter; 2013 Nov 27.

Slob S, Hack R. 3D terrestrial laser scanning as a new field measurement and monitoring technique. InEngineering geology for infrastructure planning in Europe 2004 Jan 1 (pp. 179-189). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Rezk-Salama C, Hastreiter P, Teitzel C, Ertl T. Interactive exploration of volume line integral convolution based on 3D-texture mapping. InProceedings Visualization’99 (Cat. No. 99CB37067) 1999 Oct 24 (pp. 233-528). IEEE.

Garcia J, Yang Z, Mongrain R, Leask RL, Lachapelle K. 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):27-40.

Cignoni P, Callieri M, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ranzuglia G. Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool. InEurographics Italian chapter conference 2008 Jul 2 (Vol. 2008, pp. 129-136).

Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. Journal of biological engineering. 2015 Dec;9(1):1-4.

Goyanes A, Wang J, Buanz A, Martínez-Pacheco R, Telford R, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printing of medicines: engineering novel oral devices with unique design and drug release characteristics. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2015 Nov 2;12(11):4077-84.

Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R. Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Materials & Design. 2015 Oct 15;83:768-76.

Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR, Kelly D, Chen K, Pinschmidt R, Rolland JP, Ermoshkin A, Samulski ET. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1349-52.

Teulet P, inventor; Phenix Systems, assignee. Method for manufacturing an object by solidifying a powder using a laser. United States patent US 9,327,451. 2016 May 3.

Naether S, Buck U, Campana L, Breitbeck R, Thali M. The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods. International journal of legal medicine. 2012 Jan 1;126(1):89-95.

Thali MJ, Braun M, Markwalder TH, Brueschweiler W, Zollinger U, Malik NJ, Yen K, Dirnhofer R. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/ CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic science international. 2003 Aug 12;135(2):115-21.

Johnson A, Jani G, Pandey A, Patel N. Digital tooth reconstruction: An innovative approach in forensic odontology. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology. 2019 Dec 1;37(3).

Jani G, Johnson A, Belcher W. Case report: Digital restoration of fragmented non-human skull. Forensic Science International: Reports. 2020 Dec 1;2:100070.

AbouHashem Y, Dayal M, Savanah S, Štrkalj G. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Medical education online. 2015 Jan 1;20(1):29847.

Naftulin JS, Kimchi EY, Cash SS. Streamlined, inexpensive 3D printing of the brain and skull. PloS one. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0136198.

Avis NJ, Kleinermann F, McClure J. Soft Tissue Surface Scanning–A Comparison of Commercial 3D Object Scanners for Surgical Simulation Content Creation and Medical Education Applications. InInternational Symposium on Medical Simulation 2004 Jun 17 (pp. 211-220). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Li CS, Irby B. An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal. 2008 Jun 1;42(2).

Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):3-17.

Prior DD, Mazanov J, Meacheam D, Heaslip G, Hanson J. Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education. 2016 Apr 1;29:91-7.

Kavitha B, Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Limitations in forensic odontology. Journal of forensic dental sciences. 2009 Jan 1;1(1):8.

Adams AA. The Challenges of Digital Education in the Information Age. The possibilities of ethical ICT. 2013;6.

Nuzzolese E, Di Vella G. The development of a colorimetric scale as a visual aid for the bruise age determination of bite marks and blunt trauma. The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology. 2012 Dec;30(2):1.

Márquez-Grant N, Errickson D. Ethical considerations: An added dimension. InHuman remains: Another dimension 2017 Jan 1 (pp. 193-204). Academic Press.

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

FORENSIC EDUCATION ON 3-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL ODONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS: CHALLENGES IN CROSS FORENSIC SCIENCE DISCIPLINARY TEACHING & LEARNING . (2023). Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 40(2), 132-136. https://jfmtonline.com/index.php/jfmt/article/view/58