Clustering Psychosocial Stressors in Poisoning Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.03.13Keywords:
Poisoning, Suicide, Psychosocial, Socioeconomic, PsychologicalAbstract
Poisoning is a major public health concern, with a substantial proportion of cases associated with intentional self-harm and significant psychosocial burden. Evidence suggests that psychosocial stressors rarely occur in isolation and instead interact in complex patterns, influencing vulnerability to adverse outcomes. To investigate the co-occurrence and structural relationships among psychosocial stressors in poisoning cases and identify underlying latent domains and clustering patterns. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 100 poisoning cases. Psychosocial variables including family disputes, financial stress, occupational stress, stigma, fear, and hopelessness were analysed as binary indicators. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and co-occurrence assessment using the Jaccard index were performed. Exploratory factor analysis with parallel analysis was used to identify latent structures, retaining factors where observed eigenvalues exceeded those from simulated and resampled data. Hierarchical clustering using Ward’s method was applied to evaluate grouping of individuals based on stressor profiles. Analyses were performed using R (version4.5.3). Hopelessness was the most prevalent stressor (80%), followed by occupational (70%) and financial stress (65%). Strong co-occurrence was observed between financial and occupational stress (J = 0.73). Psychosocial stressors in poisoning cases exhibit a structured, multidimensional organization rather than isolated occurrence. The identification of distinct stress domains highlights the importance of addressing combined psychosocial environments in risk assessment and intervention strategies. This study indicates that psychosocial stressors in poisoning cases are categorised into distinct but interconnected groups, primarily economical strain and emotional stigma-related distress.
Downloads
References
Nematolahi, S., Isaei, E., Baniasadi, M., Ghasemi, N. R., Jalali, M., Sarhadi, Z., et al. (2025). Epidemiology of suicide and associated factors in Bam: A historical cohort study. Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179398446250721063050
Basnet, A., Shrestha, D., Chaulagain, S., Thapa, A., Khadka, M., Regmi, B., et al. (2021). Psychological and clinical-epidemiological profile of poisoning in Nepal: An institutional experience. F1000Research, 10, 556. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.54327.2
Bhattacharjee, B., Roy, S., Alam, M. M. J., Royle, R. K. S., Paul, S., Islam, M. S., et al. (2023). Psychosocial factors behind deliberate self-poisoning in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Cureus, 15(6), e39893. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39893
Raut, A., Shaj, K., & Pawar, A. (2017). Psychosocial factors as risk factor in suicidal poisoning: A cross-sectional study. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 10(8), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i8.18983
Åberg, M., Staats, E., Robertson, J., Schiöler, L., Torén, K., LaMontagne, A. D., et al. (2022). Psychosocial job stressors and risk of suicidal behavior—An observational study among Swedish men. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 48(6), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4039
Leydesdorff, L. (2009). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0911.1447
Finch, W. H. (2023). A comparison of methods for determining the number of factors to retain with exploratory factor analysis of dichotomous data. Psych, 5(3), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067
Çokluk, Ö., & Koçak, D. (2016). Using Horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
Wood, N. D., Akloubou Gnonhosou, D. C., & Bowling, J. (2015). Combining parallel and exploratory factor analysis in identifying relationship scales in secondary data. Marriage & Family Review, 51(5), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785
Murtagh, F., & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z
Lee, S. I., & Jung, H. Y. (2006). Psychosocial risk factors for suicide. Psychiatry Investigation, 3, 15–22.
Namgung, E., Ha, E., Yoon, S., Song, Y., Lee, H., Kang, H. J., et al. (2024). Identifying unique subgroups in suicide risks among psychiatric outpatients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 131, 152463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152463
Senapati, R. E., Jena, S., Parida, J., Panda, A., Patra, P. K., Pati, S., et al. (2024). The patterns, trends and major risk factors of suicide among Indian adolescents—A scoping review. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05447-8
Mathew, A., & Nanoo, S. (2013). Psychosocial stressors and patterns of coping in adolescent suicide attempters. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.112200

