Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of Professional  Secrecy

Authors

  • Madhusudan R Petkar Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Sandesh B Datir Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Ashwinikumar B Sapate Professor (Corresponding Author), Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Ajay Ghangale Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author
  • Praveen Arora Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo University, Indore, India Author
  • Rahul M Band Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.2.5

Keywords:

Registered Medical Practitioner, Professional Secrecy, Confidentiality, Doctor-Patient relationship, Medical Ethics

Abstract

Confidentiality is the foundation of the physician-patient relationship, safeguarded by ethical and legal guidelines glob ally. This study evaluates Registered Medical Practitioners’ (RMPs) awareness and perception of professional secrecy,  which is crucial for preventing legal and ethical violations. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted at a  tertiary health care teaching hospital, which included 342 RMPs from various specialties. The participants’ knowledge  was assessed using a standardized questionnaire, with responses categorized based on accuracy. The findings indicated  that while RMPs were well-informed about confidentiality in cases of notifiable diseases (75.43%), their awareness dimin ished in complex situations such as disclosing patient information to employers, insurers, or in court (71.92% to 60.52%  incorrect responses). RMPs showed better understanding when the patient’s guardian or hostel warden was involved  (61.11%) but lacked knowledge in areas such as the disclosure of information without patient consent for non-commu nicable diseases. The study identified gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks guiding professional secrecy, highlighting  the need for enhanced training in medical jurisprudence during medical education. Recommendations include manda tory medical jurisprudence training during both undergraduate and postgraduate education to address these knowledge  gaps. The study underscores the importance of continuous education to ensure RMPs comply with ethical standards and  legal requirements, ultimately safeguarding patient privacy and public health. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karmakar, R. N. (Ed.). (2007). J. B. Mukherjee’s Forensic Medicine & Toxicology (3rd ed., pp. 55–57). Kolkata: Academic Publishers.

Thompson, I. E. (1979). The nature of confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 5, 57–64.

Bajpai, V. (2010). Awareness of medical confidentiality among healthcare professionals in India: A study from Northern India. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 32(4), 308–312. Retrieved from https://www.jiafm.com

Sarkar, S. P., Chatterjee, A., & Mandal, A. (2007). Knowledge and practice of patient confidentiality among healthcare providers in a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2007.003

Shankar, P. R., & Subba, B. (2011). Student attitudes towards confidentiality in healthcare: An Indian perspective. BMC Medical Ethics, 12(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-23

Das, G., & Banerjee, A. (2013). Medical confidentiality: Perceptions and practices among healthcare professionals in a teaching hospital in Kolkata, India. Journal of Indian Medical Association, 111(5), 315–318. Retrieved from https://www.jima.in

Legal & Government Documents (Online)

Indian Medical Council. (2002, March 11). Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002 [Internet]. New Delhi: Indian Medical Council. [Cited 2014 Apr 23]. Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/CodeofMedicalEthicsRegulations2002.aspx

Ahmad, S. S. (1998, September 21). Supreme Court of India Mr. ‘X’ vs Hospital ‘Z’ [Internet]. [Updated 1998 Sept; cited 2014 Apr]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382721/

Central Government Act. Section 176 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/641385/

Central Government Act. Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/734195/

Central Government Act. Section 270 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1164731/

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

R Petkar, M., B Datir, S., B Sapate, A., Ghangale, A., Arora, P., & M Band, R. (2025). Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of Professional  Secrecy. Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 42(2), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.2.5