CHALLENGES IN INTERPRETATION OF BALLISTIC INJURIES – A LEGAL PROSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Prashant Ratadiya Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot. Author
  • Utsav Parekh Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot. Author
  • Sanjay Gupta Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot. Author
  • Nikita Gupta Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2024.41.1.18

Keywords:

Forensic Ballistics, Court of Law, Firearm, Identification, Arm Act

Abstract

The terminology forensic ballistics was first given by colonel Calvin Goddard. The word “ballistics” defines the science of projectiles. The Forensic Ballistics is the application of the knowledge of firearms, powders and bullets to judicial problems. Forensic Ballistics provides scientific evidence which helps in court of law. Ballistic data have been of service to our judiciary, gives idea as to what can be expected from a scientific examination of the firearm exhibits which are so often introduced in our courts. It is always necessary to be kept in mind the sections which comes under the Arm Act. Firearm identification, Bullet identification, Cartridge identification is very important, as principle of identification says “Every Contact Leaves a Trace” . Various Methods are available which differentiate between bullet and cartridge case comparison and the challenges faced at interpretation of ballistic injuries. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dr. K.S Narayana Reddy, Dr. O.P Murty. The essentials of forensic medicine & toxicology, 34 ed, 2017, The health sciences publisher, New Delhi, Chapter-8, Pg-198.

Jaising P Modi. A Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 25 ed, LexisNexis publication, Chapter-25, Pg-627.

Martrille L, Symes SA. Interpretation of long bones ballistic trauma. Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Sep;302:109890. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109890. Epub 2019 Jul 30. PMID: 31421439.

Firearms and Toolmarks in the FBI Laboratory”. Forensic Science Communications. 2 (2). April 2000. Archived from the original on September 20, 2015. Retrieved June 5, 2016.

Com. v. Pytou Heang, 458 Mass. 827, 846-50, 942 N.E.2d 927, 944-47 (2011)

Stefanopoulos, Panagiotis K. MD, DMD; Mikros, George MD; Pinialidis, Dionisios E. MD; Oikonomakis, Ioannis N. MD, PhD; Tsiatis, Nikolaos E. PhD; Janzon, Bo PhD. Wound ballistics of military rifle bullets: An update on controversial issues and associated misconceptions. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 87(3):p 690-698, September 2019.

Durmiæ T, Radniæ B, Bogdanoviæ M, Atanasijeviæ T. Two cases of firearm-related murder-suicide: Forensic implications of the ability to act. Med Sci Law. 2019 Apr;59(2):78-82. doi: 10.1177/ 0025802419837064. Epub 2019 Mar 13. PMID: 30866713.

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

CHALLENGES IN INTERPRETATION OF BALLISTIC INJURIES – A LEGAL PROSPECTIVE . (2024). Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 41(1), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2024.41.1.18