Advancing Forensic Taphonomy: Quantitative Methods and Emerging Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.02.18Keywords:
Forensic anthropology, Forensic taphonomy, Postmortem IntervalAbstract
Forensic anthropology now stands as a fundamental discipline of forensic science, primarily dealing with identifying human remains and supporting legal investigations. Forensic taphonomy is an evolving subfield of forensic anthropology that helps unveil the mysteries surrounding death. Traditionally, taphonomy studies the mechanism of transition between death and fossilization. Forensic taphonomy provides a scientific explanation for the process by which a dead body is modified into its human remains. This integration of taphonomic research into forensic investigation features the vital role it plays in reconstructing death events and facilitating justice for the victims. The educational initiatives focused on this subject can emphasize a broader understanding of the connections between human remains, natural processes, and organisms as their remains migrate from the living surface of the biosphere to the lithosphere. Standard archaeological methods efficiently locate and document forensic sites, maximizing data quality and aiding forensic anthropologists in laboratory analyses.
Downloads
References
A EI. (1940). Taphonomy: New branch of paleontology. Pan-American Geologist, 74, 81–93.
Pokines, J. T., L’Abbé, E. N., & Symes, S. A. (2021). Manual of forensic taphonomy (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003171492
Sorg, M. H., & Haglund, W. D. (1996). Forensic taphonomy: The postmortem fate of human remains. CRC Press.
Haglund, W. D. M. H. S. (Ed.). (2018). Advances in forensic taphonomy: Method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420058352
Rattenbury, A. E. (2018). Forensic taphonomy. In T. K. Ralebitso-Senior (Ed.), Forensic ecogenomics (pp. 37–59). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809360-3.00002-3
Shrestha, R., Kanchan, T., & Krishan, K. (2023). Methods of estimation of time since death. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549867/
Collins, M. J., Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., Hiller, J., Smith, C. I., Roberts, J. P., Prigodich, R. V., et al. (2002). The survival of organic matter in bone: A review. Archaeometry, 44(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00071
Wood, P. L. (2012). Lipidomics analysis of postmortem interval: Preliminary evaluation of human skeletal muscle. Journal of Postgenomics Drug & Biomarker Development, 3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-0769.1000127
Langley, N. R., Wood, P., Herling, P., & Steadman, D. W. (2019). Forensic postmortem interval estimation from skeletal muscle tissue: A lipidomics approach. Forensic Anthropology, 2(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2019.1011
Darie-Ion, L., Whitham, D., Jayathirtha, M., Rai, Y., Neagu, A.-N., Darie, C. C., et al. (2022). Applications of MALDI-MS/MS-based proteomics in biomedical research. Molecules, 27(19), 6196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196196
Aslam, B., Basit, M., Nisar, M. A., Khurshid, M., & Rasool, M. H. (2017). Proteomics: Technologies and their applications. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 55(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmw167
Cieśla, J., Skrobisz, J., Niciński, B., Kloc, M., Mazur, K., Pałasz, A., et al. (2023). The smell of death: State-of-the-art and future research directions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1260869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1260869
Finaughty, D. A., Pead, J., Spies, M. J., & Gibbon, V. E. (2023). Next generation forensic taphonomy: Automation for experimental, field-based research. Forensic Science International, 345, 111616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111616
